In relation to Tribunal Fees, the Government Response to the consultation on proposals for the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber), was published on 15 September 2016.
Without some cursory regard to the raft of cases emanating from the Court of Appeal in the last few months, the new decision of the Court of Appeal in IT (Jamaica) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWCA Civ 932 would be almost a little too difficult to follow. The larger part of this year has seen the Court of Appeal giving persistent and reiterated guidance on the correct approach to take in deportation appeals( in regards to cases such as, CT (Vietnam), LW (Jamaica, BL (Jamaica), JZ (Zambia), Suckoo). In the last three months, the Court of Appeal turned its focus on considerations regarding the interplay between Sections 117A to 117D of the 2002 Act and paragraphs 399 and 399A of the Immigration Rules( in reference to cases such as Kamara , Rhuppiah, NA (Pakistan), MM (Uganda). We now have the case of IT (Jamaica), seeing the Court of Appeal considering paragraphs 390 to 392 of the Immigration Rules, providing guidance on the approach to take in revocation of deportation order cases, drawing the threads together as regards their earlier judgements and clearly at pains in seeking to remain consistent and faithful to those decisions.