In The Secretary of State for the Home Department v MM (Zimbabwe) [2017] EWCA Civ 797 (22 June 2017), the Court of Appeal very recently sought to advocate a less restrictive approach to an Article 3 mental health condition claim from a Zimbabwean national, yet within its judgment, glaringly fails to refer to the ECHR case of Paposhvili, from which that approach can arguably be said to originate from.