Inbuilt obstacles and mechanisms that the Home Office use to defeat, deny and deter immigration claims

On the surface, all that is required to enable preparation and submission of a successful application to the Home Office is self-evident.  After all, the application forms themselves are free and readily accessible (postal or on-line, as relevant). These applications forms indicate what documents are required to support an application. Additionally, voluminous Home Office guidance policy is transparently available for leisurely perusal in advance of submitting an application. With all this in sight, in some categories, it seems there  isn’t even any need to consult a legal practitioner prior to submission of an application.

 

There are however in-built laws, policies and procedures in the assessment process of immigration applications, such that a seemingly straightforward application may end up falling foul of these provisions.

 

Continue reading

Know The Procedure: Brand New Home Office Guidance on Validity and Rejection of Leave to Remain Applications

The Specified Forms and Applications Home Office policy guidance has been replaced in its entirety  by the Applications for leave to remain: validation, variation and withdrawal, guidance published on 6 April 2017. The new guidance describes how home office caseworkers decide whether an application for leave to remain in the UK is valid, and what to do if it is not. It also describes how an applicant can vary and withdraw an application and how to calculate the date of application.

 

My previous blog article based on the previous policy guidance :

 

https://ukimmigrationjusticewatch.com/2015/11/04/home-office-applications-the-very-things-that-are-likely-to-get-an-application-rejected-as-invalid-by-the-home-office/

 

must now be viewed as modified to some extent by the new governing guidance.

 

An application for leave to remain in the UK is valid when the requirements of Paragraph 34 of the Immigration Rules are met, or where one of the exceptions set out in paragraph 34 apply. The requirements must be met by each applicant:-if the main applicant meets the validation requirements, but a dependent on the same application does not, the main applicant’s application is valid, and the dependant’s application can be rejected as invalid.

 

Continue reading

Expedition, Reconsideration of EEA applications and EEA Appeal Rights under the 2016 Regulations

Following an adverse decision being made by the Home Office, an affected person may be torn between re-applying for residence documentation, requesting reconsideration or appealing an EEA decision.  In practice however, requesting that the Home Office re-consider a decision made on deportation grounds, rather than submit an appeal would be pure folly: the Home Office are very likely to maintain the same negative decision and most importantly, the failure to appeal would likely leave the EEA national or their family member subject to deportation without any other viable alternative remedy and liable to imminent removal.

Continue reading

A Government’s onslaught on refugees: Safe return reviews, cessation, exclusion, and revocation

Prior to 9 March 2017,  the general  view certainly was that, Home Office practice (subject to some exceptions), was to routinely grant settlement to  refugees  who had  completed the 5year probationary period.  On  9 March 2017,  the Home Office however published updated  Guidance, Refugee Leave  dated  2 March 2017, firmly indicating  that,  “All those who apply for settlement protection after completing the appropriate probationary period of limited leave will be subject to a safe return review with reference to the country situation at the date the application is considered”.

 

Not only that but that  refugees can  be subject to the  review procedure at any  juncture whilst holding  refugee status, “ A person’s case may also be reviewed at any point in the process either when triggered by their actions, for example, they are convicted of a serious crime, or in light of a significant and non-temporary change in conditions in their country of origin such that they no longer need protection”.

 

 

Continue reading